Blog Your Site

With work to go to, kids to put to bed, homework to check, dishes to get done, and wives to spend time with, it’s almost impossible for busy dads to squeeze in a exercise.The easiest way I’ve found to stay in shape is to practice body weight exercises.Here’s why you should be doing body weight exercises if you’re a busy dad…

Effectiveness – If you’re wondering how effective body weight exercises are, just ask the firemen, police officers, and elite fighters who do them on a daily basis. They won’t be the biggest guys you’ll ever come across, but they’ll be among the strongest. (more…)

Just about every man wishes he had a much larger penis, and you should be aware of the details about products that claim to give you a bigger penis before you jump on the bandwagon.

Firstly, you have to know what your product options are. There are hundreds of different male enhancement products out there that can give you a bigger penis, but there’s also thousands out that that will not do anything and cost you a small fortune. (more…)

Wouldn’t you like to have a bigger penis? I know of few men that wouldn’t love to have a penis that was larger and stronger and held rock solid erections longer. With the use of good-quality enhancement pills, you can have not only a larger penis, but also an erection that comes quicker and lasts longer. (more…)

Slow Motion Belly Slap & Man Boobs

I first developed flabby man breasts when I was a chubby fifteen year old boy. They caused me enormous embarrassment when I had to attend school swimming lessons and I vowed never to take my shirt off in public again.

That was more than 30 years ago and I’ve stuck to my vow, until recently. (more…)

How To Get Rid Of Man Boobs : Chest Workout

I first developed these unsightly breasts when I was a spotty, fat fifteen year old. The embarassment they caused me resulted in my making a vow never to take my shirt off in public again.

That was over 30 years ago and I’ve stuck to my vow right up until recent changes. (more…)

I write on my blog.Theme of blog is bodybuilding

Countless men all over the world benefit from Viagra, Cialis, and Levitra every day. The erectile dysfunction medications have enabled men who suffer from ED to enjoy sexually active lifestyles, positively impacting the quality of their relationships. The drugs have also had a surprising environmental impact, affecting endangered animals and US water supplies.

Before FDA-approved drugs were available to treat erectile dysfunction, other remedies were used to combat impotence. Sadly, some of these remedies involved eating endangered animals. Animals like the tiger and rhinoceros were heavily hunted for their penises and testicles, which were used to create concoctions for treating ED. Clinical testing has shown, however, that these remedies have absolutely no effect on erectile function.

With the arrival of Viagra, the demand for endangered animals has decreased. Unfortunately though, some manufacturers of these animal-based concoctions have been known to add Viagra’s active ingredient into their mixtures, therefore creating the illusion that the “natural” remedies are effective.

While Viagra may have had a positive impact on endangered animals, it seems to be having a negative impact on America’s water supply. The Associated Press has reported that at least 271 million pounds of pharmaceuticals have been legally released into U.S. waterways. Trace amounts of pharmaceuticals can be found in almost every major metropolitan water supply in the country, ranging from pain medications to Viagra.

In addition to factory waste, pharmaceuticals get into the water supply via human excretion, as well as from people dumping drugs down the toilet.

The federal government doesn’t require water testing, and doesn’t have any safety limits established for drugs in water.

While people are quick to sing Viagra’s praises for its bedroom benefits, the drug’s impact on the economy draws the attention of few. As with any medication, it is simply being responsible, for your own health, and for the health of the environment, to only use legitimate, FDA-approved medication, and to properly dispose of any unused quantities. Resisting the urge to flush old medication can help to gradually decontaminate our drinking water. Additionally, buying genuine Viagra can help to save a tiger’s life, and his penis.

Scientists from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York have developed a potential erectile dysfunction treatment utilizing nanotechnology. With this treatment, nanoparticles are loaded with nitric oxide (a naturally-occurring chemical in the body that makes blood vessels expand and fill with blood).

The drug’s tiny particles are absorbed directly through the skin, causing a much faster reaction time than drugs like Viagra that are taken orally. In fact, the lab tests in rats have shown response times as fast as 10 minutes. By applying the product directly to the area needing increased blood flow, only that area reacts to the drug, rather than the whole body being affected.

Another potential advantage this treatment could have is its lack of the mild side effects noticed when taking Viagra, Cialis, and Levitra, because the drug is applied directly to the skin, and not ingested.

The study, presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association, shows promising results in lab rats. Researchers are hopeful that similar results will be seen in humans.

Everybody has seen ads on TV for erectile dysfunction medications. Whether you love the couple sitting in their individual outdoor bathtubs in the Cialis commercials, or hate those Viagra commercials with the over-used “Viva Viagra” song, it makes no difference. The advertisements for ED treatments are highly visible on television. But do people really think these very tame ads are obscene? A congressman from Virginia certainly thinks so.

Last week, Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA) introduced a bill to congress that would cause ED product advertising to fall under the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) enforcement of indecency. This would ban broadcasters from airing erectile dysfunction drug ads between 6 A.M. and 10 P.M.

The FCC defines an indecent broadcast as one that contains language or material that depicts or describes sexual organs in a way that is offensive to the contemporary community.

It’s surprising to think that present-day society could consider erectile dysfunction, a medical condition, offensive. Rep. Moran’s bill would also affect male enhancement product ads, but male enhancement products and erectile dysfunction products are completely different. Enhancement products are purely for vanity/cosmetic purposes, whereas ED products are for treating a medical condition. The two product groups are clearly separate, and that is usually depicted in their different advertising styles (think Cialis’ bathtub couple vs. Enzyte’s Smilin’ Bob).

It is interesting to note that, in addition to sexual organs, the FCC’s definition of an indecent broadcast also includes excretory organs or activities. Is anybody thinking about Depends commercials right now? I sure am. But I don’t see a congressman trying to get incontinence products banned from the air.

It will be interesting to see what happens to Rep. Moran’s bill. He was unsuccessful in the past when he tried to introduce the bill, but if the bill passes, the FCC can dish out fines up to $325,000 to stations that air the “indecent” material.

If the congressman has a wife, she must feel like garbage though, knowing her husband thinks of sex as indecent.

Some of the most serious side effects listed in the patient/prescribing information for Viagra and other ED medications have to do with vision.

The good news is that these occurrences are very rare. Also, a study published in the April, 2009 edition of Archives of Ophthalmology showed that 212 men who took Viagra and Cialis every day for three months reported no changes in visual function, signs of retina damage or intraocular pressure. A total of 155 of these men continued to take the medications for a total of 6 months, and they also reported no vision loss or impairment of any kind.

The FDA stated in 2005 that a “small number” of reports linked vision loss in men to the use of FDA-approved ED medications. This resulted in a labeling change on packages of Viagra, Cialis and Levitra. Viagra entered the U.S. market in 1998 and Cialis and Levitra entered the market in 2003.

Yet, the FDA said “it is not possible to determine whether these oral medicines for erectile dysfunction were the cause of the loss of eyesight or whether the problem is related to other factors such as high blood pressure or diabetes, or to a combination of these problems.”

In any case, the above-referenced Archives of Ophthalmology study showed evidence that should be very assuring to men who take FDA-approved ED medications. The authors of this study concluded that, with regard to the vision of study participants, “results indicate that there is no cumulative damage or effect of clinical significance for either 5 milligrams of tadalafil (Cialis) or 50 milligrams of sildenafil (Viagra) taken daily for six months.”